Skip to main content
Age discrimination
- What are the requirements on age discrimination?
- When did the requirements come into force?
- In practice, we don't need to worry about these new requirements unless we employ people in their 50s and 60s, do we?
- In what way will these requirements affect our recruitment procedures?
- So OK, we have to watch our language in our recruitment ads. Do we have to do anything else?
- Our sales guys are all in their 20s. If we recruited someone in his 60s (well yes, or her 60s) he just wouldn't fit. We don't have to, do we?
- We don't have to recruit 17-year olds for jobs dealing with customers, do we? They'd obviously be no good.
- Is the new law really saying that I need quotas for each age group on my workforce?
- We're looking for a new MD. It will take him (or her) a couple of years to find his feet, and we want at least five years' work thereafter. Do we have to consider people of 60-plus?
- We like people to be physically fit, and this rules out most people over 40. Is this OK?
- Are we allowed to advertise jobs specifically to age groups under-represented in our workforce?
- We've got a vacancy for a supervisor, but the best internal candidate would be 20 years younger than some of the guys he would be managing. What do we do?
- Surely we can't be expected to select a 60 year-old for a job that requires two years' training?
- Our management is in its late 50s. We're selecting people for promotion now, and have good candidates of that age, but we'll end up with a succession problem. Can we select from younger people?
- We've got people who want to retire at 55. Do we have to stop them?
- What do we do about people who are obviously slowing up as they approach retirement age?
- We have been retiring people at 62. Do we have to keep them on until 65?
- If we abandon a fixed retirement age altogether, does that mean that we could be done for unfair dismissal if we need to get rid of someone at 69 or 70?
- We have an awkward employee in his late 50s, who we hoped was going to take early retirement. We couldn't take another seven years of him. What do you suggest?
- We've got some good workers in their late 50s, and we'll be happy to keep them on, but they won't want to do it full time. Can we amend their terms?
- What do we have to do for employees approaching retirement age, and what happens if we don't do it?
- What exactly do the regulations mean, when they talk about a 'duty to consider' requests to work beyond 65?
- Do we have to stop the youngsters making cracks about the golden oldies - and vice versa?
- We require people to have at least one year's service before they qualify for a season ticket loan. Will this be banned?
- We have a collective agreement with our union for improved redundancy terms for people with more than 20 years' service. Can this stand?
- Can we continue to give longer-serving employees the pick of the holiday dates?
- What is 'objective justification'?
- What is a 'legitimate aim' under the regulations?